The DPS on Minor Works and Maintenance is a new agreement accessible to NHS Trusts and wider public sector organisations, covering both a wide range of categories of works and maintenance services related to construction and construction. While there is no single measure of what would represent “large quantities of suppliers” or “large volumes of transactions”, it is reasonable to expect that if the required services are to benefit from multiple providers, the “large” ones will be more than 20 suppliers. Below this number, other options may provide more suitable alternatives, such as. B the possibility of setting up several supplier frameworks. The volume of transactions would certainly amount to hundreds and more per year, without the possibility of consolidating the service provided and/or limiting the resulting individual transactions. Total planned spending is also a key factor in ensuring that the associated effort achieves the expected benefits of a DPS agreement. While there is no number defined in “what constitutes large quantities of suppliers/transactions”, there are also no minimum expenditures per year. However, it should be noted that with less effort, the effort required to implement a DPS may not pay for the planned services. /categories/estates-facilities-professional-services/language-services-dynamic-purchasing-system The flexibility to maintain a DPS agreement open to new entities allows public sector bodies to promote possible “competitive bidding” under the DPS in their geographic region. This provides an opportunity to work with potential local suppliers and supports the government`s broader goals of working with local businesses for economic growth. When a framework agreement is concluded, the PSBO has generally carried out a full assessment of suppliers against the award criteria to ensure that the suppliers in the framework are able to propose the most economically advantageous tender using a combination of price and quality criteria. Using a framework allows you to focus your efforts on suppliers who have already proven to offer good, inexpensive value for money in their market, rather than having to evaluate quotes from suppliers who can`t. Decisions regarding the use of a DPS as a delivery option should be carefully considered before formally committing to do so.
The expected benefits can be clearly listed, but what can be more difficult is quantifying these benefits and selling them to a wider audience. Simply put, DPS agreements are the most suitable or targeted spending areas when certain elements come together, in particular a large number of suppliers (without a recognised single or natural market or connection between these providers) combined with a large volume of transactions. DPS systems have their place and there are categories and products for which a DPS would be perfect. Markets with a high pace of change, commodities with a high or less complex trading volume can benefit greatly. However, if you have complex goods or services such as outsourced cleaning and catering services, you may decide that the benefits of a traditional framework agreement make it a more suitable supply vehicle due to the additional review by the PSBO at the listed suppliers. A dynamic purchasing system (DPS) is different from a traditional framework for the delivery of goods, works or services. .