This means that one party (the compensating party) pays the damages, duties, expenses and other forms of payment covered by this provision if the other party (the compensated party) and the parties compensated in the provision were to suffer harm as a result of injury suffered by the party compensated under the agreement. The things that the compensated party could do, which would lead to liability to the compensated party, are listed at the end of the provision (essentially acts or omissions under the agreement). This provision requires the compensated party to immediately notify the compensated party of a claim and allow that party to control the defence or settlement of the claim. The chord is a phenomenon in the natural language, in which the form of a word or morphems covariate with the form of another word or sentence in the sentence. For example, in the English phrase John goes Fido every morning, the shape of the “walks” is conditioned by the characteristics of the theme, “John”. This can be replaced by “John” by an element with different relevant characteristics, as in We go fido every morning, leading to a change in the form of “walks” to “walks” (or, alternatively, a change from “-s” to an empty morpheme, . The agreement is perhaps the morphosytic phenomenon that arises, because it is the morphological expression of a relationship that most researchers consider a syntactic relationship (although not without dissent; see morphological approaches). In contemporary linguistics, the term agreement is (unfortunately) used to refer alternately to the phenomenon itself and to the hypothetical grammatical mechanism that results. Unless otherwise stated, the term is used here only in the neutral and descriptive theoretical sense. Another point of terminology variability concerns the identity of the grammatical elements that conclude an agreement. Canonically, the term is used to describe the morphological covariance between certain verbal elements in a clause (typically carrying the Tense/Aspect/Morphology) and a nominal argument in the same clause; but the term has also been used to describe many other matings of kovarying elements (for example. B nominates and its adjective modifiers, nouns and their owners, pre/post positions and their supplements, etc.; and more recently, the effects of the tension sequence, pronouns and their precursors, and even the relationship between several negative elements in a single clause; see the re-enrollment agreement as another explanation).